| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| norm |
Posted - 18 December 2005 : 14:53:42
Or is there??
The attached link shows that the ON's winger was also called Paul Burrows.... coincidence or what!
http://www.rugbyroundup.com/Stats_matchstats.aspx?GID=10101
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| The Jackal |
Posted - 01 February 2006 : 20:10:48
So now its in black and white 'Rolfs Yaris!' So when you dummy and get scragged i'll haunt you with your own words...'now i can pass and tackle'
_________________________
Put him in the locker!!! BOSH! |
| pie and peas for supper |
Posted - 31 January 2006 : 10:59:10
quote:
Originally posted by Rolfy
Well you've got an excuse not to pass when you're on the wing!!
There were no pies missing at the Colts game on Saturday!!
yum yum |
| wingof fire |
Posted - 31 January 2006 : 09:18:17
that jackal , coruscating pace (joe mills - it means fast) |
| Rolfy |
Posted - 31 January 2006 : 09:17:30
I used to play on the wing, but then i learnt to pass and tackle!! Oh yeah and i started eating too many pies! |
| The Jackal |
Posted - 31 January 2006 : 06:23:48
Rolfy, don't start dissin' wingers. if you too were a touch quicker then you may get the opportunities that norm and myself get.
Just to clear things up, being on my inside shoulder to get a pass when i gas it means to be within 15 metres of me ok!?!?
By the way, thanks for the pass for my second try. Thats how to support a break.
_________________________
Put him in the locker!!! BOSH! |
| Rolfy |
Posted - 29 January 2006 : 10:35:56
Well you've got an excuse not to pass when you're on the wing!! |
| norm |
Posted - 28 January 2006 : 22:18:23
quote:
Originally posted by norm
quote:
Originally posted by Rolfy
Norm on the wing? That could be interesting!
Release the Beast
I would be lomu-esque, without the pace.... and Beest is spelt with A DOUBLE E 
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH
Rolfsy....and interesting it was, and as predicted, lomu-esque as i cantered in for a pair!!
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH |
| sadam |
Posted - 21 December 2005 : 18:16:35
Who's Paul Burrows? |
| Rolfy |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 17:22:45
Sorry Millsey, I can't comment on it because I didn't see it, or maybe I bought it too... |
| norm |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 16:41:33
It was a classic, you'd have thought he would have learnt not to fall for that....
Hey Jackal, what's that on the back of your shoe?
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH |
| joemills |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 16:29:20
All this high brow stuff is making me nervous. Can we get back to commenting about PB being stiched up like a kipper with that dummy |
| norm |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 16:25:29
quote:
Originally posted by Rolfy
And your should be you're or you are where you've used it in your last post!!
If you want to be picky, should there have been some punctuation marks within your sentence?
And your should be you're, or you are, where you've used it in your last post!! 
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH |
| norm |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 16:20:41
It was 5am!
tick followed tock followed tick followed MMUURRGGHHHHH |
| joemills |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 16:20:29
And thats a development place for you then Rolfy.
There is only one Paul Burrows |
| Rolfy |
Posted - 20 December 2005 : 15:53:27
Actually it's got nothing to do with me scoring Norm, I've always been like this!
And your should be you're or you are where you've used it in your last post!! |
